Comparison
A connected system instead of a puzzle you have to assemble yourself.
You can achieve almost all of this by combining several tools. The difference is who maintains the connections and the context: you, or the system.
Point by point
| Capability | Separate tools | IBANSI BOSS |
|---|---|---|
| Company knowledge | Spread across people and folders | Centralised and approved in the Dossier |
| Website | A separate platform | Connected to the rest of the system |
| CRM | A separate system | Connected to knowledge and the website |
| Website enquiries | An integration, or copy and paste | Native flow through to the opportunity |
| Bookings | A separate tool | Connected to the customer and the diary |
| Payments | A separate integration | Part of the same customer journey |
| AI | Generic context, every time | Context about your company, with sources |
| Documents | Manual or in another tool | Generated from templates with your information |
| Automation | Several connectors to maintain | Workflows across areas of the same system |
| Customisation | Limited by each provider | Configuration and extensions from IBANSI |
| Customer history | Fragmented across apps | Unified wherever it's enabled |
When we're not the best option
A comparison that only ever favours the person writing it is useless. These cases are real.
- If you already have a highly specialised system that works and your whole team knows well, changing it for the sake of change doesn't pay off.
- If you need very vertical, regulated functionality that a specialised product covers better, keep it and connect everything else.
- If your company has more than fifty people and complex data governance, it needs proper evaluation before deciding.
- If nobody in the company is going to review knowledge or approve anything, no system will fix that.
Shall we compare it against your real case?
Tell us which tools you use today and what they cost you. We'll tell you honestly what you'd gain, and what you wouldn't.